At 05:26 PM 2/18/2003, Bo Persson wrote:
>A lot of the failures seems to be a "warning" that 7.1 actually does the
>right thing. A bit unfair to count this as a failure!
Warnings aren't counted as failures. A test compile, link, or run has to
actually report failure (via non-zero return code).
I've cleared the boost\type_traits\is_convertible.hpp(154) problem. That
accounted for a dozen or so failures, so the results are looking even
better. Failure rate dropped to 8%.
--Beman
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
- [boost] Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta regression tests poste... Beman Dawes
- Re: [boost] Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta regression te... Peter Dimov
- Re: [boost] Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta regressio... Beman Dawes
- [boost] Re: Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta regre... Bo Persson
- [boost] Re: Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta r... Beman Dawes
- [boost] Re: Win32/VC++ 7.1 final beta regression te... Alisdair Meredith