Ronald Garcia wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like your library is adding names > (like guarded_size) to the boost::mpl namespace. Is that your intention? > For that matter, is the mpl namespace for all metaprograms, or just those > associated with the MPL library? Would your additions be generally useful > for other libraries?
You're correct. My intention was that the additions (guarded_size and guarded_distance) would be generally useful additions to the MPL, and that is why I coded them as such. I didn't want to force the issue without discussing with Aleksey first though. Problem is I had some trouble moving the two metafunctions to boost::detail::variant::mpl because of the way the MPL workaround macros work. The problem you noticed was a result of a partial change in this direction. Thus, if variant is accepted, either 1) Aleksey would agree to adding these components, or 2) I would determine a suitable way to move them into the detail namespace. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
