"Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>     I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
> >
> > Do you have a use-case for this?
>
> Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to
> use it this way?  I am not sure, but it would be better for continous
> optional<>s this way?

Dave is asking you if you are solving a problem that doesn't exist. ;)
Your answer seems to indicate as much. ;)

Dave




_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to