Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sam: I looked at the patches, especially the doc. I think you should write > some more, as you were influenced from your knowledge. I suggest you begin > with mentioning operator bool() and what's wrong with it before presenting > the solution. Think of new users that potentially don't even know that > there is a problem with operator bool(). Also, if you like, you can write > a brief note about why the "classic" solution I showed (using a private > operator int() in parallel to operator bool()) is not a good solution and > how yours/Peter's is better. All this can/should happen in the note you > added. The note itself should be added to the index at the top and you > might want to add yourself to the contributors' list at the end.
Very nice remarks, Daniel. I have full confidence in you as the new maintainer of the operators library. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
