> > Well, I think you're right, but the question remains: what should we
> > do about it?  Should we just replace BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME?
>
> That's what I would do. John?
>
> Aleksey

If I remember correcty Dave introduced that macro anyway, so yes go ahead
and change it- can you make sure that the config test case stays up to date
with the changed meaning though?

Thanks,

John.


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to