At 03:23 AM 3/10/2003, Geurt Vos wrote: >Hi, >Is there any reason boost::filesystem::path doesn't >provide a swap(path &) function? If there is, I think >the docs should explain why, but if there isn't, well, >can it still be implemented before 1.30.0 goes gold?
Let me turn the question around and ask what your expectations would be for a swap member beyond what is already offered by std::swap?
No throw guarantee?
More efficient?
Or are you asking that filesystem::path satisfy more container requirements?
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
