Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:

Markus Schöpflin wrote:

currently, the is_member_func_test fails for VACPP6 with the
following error messages:

<snip>


When looking at is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp it looks like the
Metrowerks compiler has the same problem. Could anyone please add
a check for __IBMCPP__ <=600 at line 345 of this file and
regenerate it?

The fix still seems missing. If anyone can please tell me how to correctly regenerate the file I can fix it on my own.


Should be as simple as creating a two-line source file:

#define BOOST_TT_PREPROCESSING_MODE
#include "boost/type_traits/detail/is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp"

preprocessing it, and replacing "//: #" by "#" in the resulting output.

Well, that won't give you a drop-in replacement for the original
"detail/is_mem_fun_pointer_impl.hpp" header, of course, but instead a
re-generated block of 'is_mem_fun_pointer_impl' specializations to copy &
paste there.

Aleksey, thanks for the instructions. Could you tell me which PP you used to generate the file before? I would like to minimize the diff as much as possible?


TIA, Markus


_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to