Daniel Frey wrote: > Beman Dawes wrote: >> >> * Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington >> Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes. > > We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and > thus in the regression tests for some time. When Sam started the > proposal, the branch for 1.30.0 has already happened (IIRC) and to > me, this means bug-fixes only. I don't know when exactly you are > planning to release > 1.30.0, but if there is enough time and Sam (and others) would like to > see the addition ASAP, we can try to push things a bit. Currently, > it's an 1.31.0 item as far as I'm concerned. Sam, is this OK for you?
Well, I would love to get in 1.30, but I think it may take a little longer that we'd hope. I've just spotted a problem with the private operator int() implementation which breaks almost every single operators test going! I will elaborate when I've done more testing. So yes, unfortunately, I think we're looking at a 1.31 item. Sam _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
