On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:52:07 -0500, David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Kevlin Henney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> However, the decision as to whether this should be in the 'what' string >> is perhaps one that can be revisited. It would be feasible to avoid any >> allocation issues at all by leaving the human readable string as general >> as it was before and adding type_info members that described the source >> and target types. > >Yes, that was my suggestion. I'm happy that std::type_info has a private copy constructor. Hadn't it been for that, my suggestion to use just a couple of typedefs would have been routinely rejected :-) Genny. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
