You might want to read http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/lsp.pdf for a rationale of the LSP. A somewhat different view is expressed in http://alistair.cockburn.us/crystal/articles/cdos/constructivedesconstructionofsubtyping.htm.
Am Son, 2003-03-23 um 14.00 schrieb David Abrahams: > LSP is weird anyway. What's the point of polymorphism if you're not > going to change the behavior of the class in some observable way? If > the derived class were transparently substitutable for the base class > it wouldn't be much good, would it? > > -- > Dave Abrahams > Boost Consulting > www.boost-consulting.com > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
