> Even if none of the above looks sound for you I still argue that > lexical_cast *should not force* inclusion of typeinfo. It's not > "inconvinience" - it's showstopper. It's much more important > than providing > specific type info. In majority of the cases one knows it anyway. > > > Kevlin > > Gennadiy.
So. Are we gonna stuck with typeinfo in lexical_cast? Could we have at least some discussion about this? Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
