> Type_info is part of the C++ standard. I don't understand the > turning off of this in C++ code, but even it is done for an > implementation,
Let me clrify again that I don't think that this is the feature optionally supported by compilers. By now almost all cvompilers I know supports RTTI one way or another. Unfortunately from my expirience RTTI implementations usually have non-negligeble runtime overhead (in both speed and size). Be aware that if even one class in progrma is using std::type_info, I am forcing to turn on RTTI that affects *all* classes. > I don't think that Boost should now have to > worry about not supporting it in a library because end-users > can turn it off. I could not turn of RTTI once typeinfo is included. I will get link errors. Gennadiy. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost