"Chris Trengove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks. It certainly helps to have a clearer understanding of what is going > on here. I'll see if I can come up with a "simpler" BCC-specific approach.
Please see if you can come up with a simpler non-specific approach which might break cwpro7. That's what I'd like to have in the codebase. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
