Alexander Terekhov wrote: > Peter Dimov wrote: >> >> Trevor Taylor wrote: >>> >>> Why wait? With so many people contributing to boost, why not >>> introduce a pthread_refcount_t into into boost threads (or is there >>> one already?), provide a default implementation equivalent to what >>> shared_ptr does now, >> >> We can't; shared_ptr uses a single pthread_mutex to protects its two >> counts. A naive pthread_mutex based pthread_refcount_t would result >> in two mutexes, one per count. > > Yeah. http://google.com/groups?q=PTHREAD_REFCOUNT_NONBLOCKING
Something like that. Are you planning to implement a "real" pthread_refcount_t for, say, Windows and Linux/x86? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
