> Stefan Seefeld wrote: > ...are tailored towards java, and there is often either no C++ mapping or one that I consider rather poor > as it doesn't make any use of C++ specific idioms. > > I wrote a C++ wrapper library around libxml2 (http://xmlsoft.org/), > and would like to submit it to boost. It currently provides a DOM-like > and a SAX-like interface, is parametrized for the (possibly unicode > enabled) string type, and has already proven its value for my own > projects.
What is wrong with Xerces-C++ library (http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/index.html) ? AC. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
