> This was my understanding too, which is why I claimed that my > wave executable might be buggy. Does your wave executable > also puke on the above snippet - if it does not, then i think > my wave's behavior may be an artifact of my "dirty" fix to > get the code to compile by declaring a primary template in > order to make the explicit specialization of "policy..." > well-formed. I have not studied the source code for wave yet > - and before (or if) i do, i was hoping if someone could > confirm or deny experiencing the same behavior with their > wave executable. > > regards, > Faisal Vali
My executable does the same thing, so it is indeed a bug. I'm sure Hartmut will fix this shortly. Regards, Paul Mensonides _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
