Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > Being one of the persons who raised the accuracy issue, I think I have > to say why. > > The proposed mathematical functions are not there just for selling > compilers. They are there to serve *practical* purposes. If there is > no accuracy guarantee, they don't worth to have -- they are already so > specialized. LIA has already set framework for those things. Any > serious proposal to include such specialized functions need to pay > attention to those things. > > -- Gaby
Well, *practical* can mean a number of things to different people. Maybe performance constraints should be template parameters with default values? One possibility being precision? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
