Nicolas Fleury wrote: [...] > What is the paper you have in mind to justify the absence of semaphores? > I would like very much to understand and be convinced. It would also > be nice if the #10 of the FAQ would point to this paper.
It can be found here: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0387954015/104-6312782-0737542 regards, alexander. -- http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3D58D3BC.6D42748B%40web.de _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
