David Abrahams wrote: > > Hmmm... You're removed the boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp file > > intentionally, right? This makes it even more problematic, because, > > there is no chance to circumvent compilation errors. > > There are going to be compilation errors anyway, since the > interface is drastically different.
Sure, but I said, that without boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp there is no way to circumvent them. > > What about re-introducing the boost/iterator_adaptors.hpp file: > > > > #define BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION 0x2000 > > #include <boost/iterator/iterator_adaptor.hpp> > > > > This would allow for some version tracking and a smooth > migration path > > for those libraries, willing to support both, the new _and_ the old > > iterator libs. Thought's? > > OK, that seems reasonable. Libraries can check to see if > BOOST_ITERATOR_ADAPTOR_VERSION is defined and use different > code in that case. Fine, looking forward. Regards Hartmut _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
