While writing some other code, I checked out how some of the macros in Boost.Test are implemented. The BOOST_CHECK_THROW and BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION macros flag when an intentional exception was missed and when the expected exception type was caught. But what about when an exception of the _wrong_ type is thrown. Shouldn't there be a catch(...) that notes that the wrong type was caught and re-throws the error?

Daryle

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to