--- Reed Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > However, in my experience GCC 3.3 is a lot worse than 3.2, so if
That's my experience, too, but I don't use cygwin. General observations: - we had to add a couple of gcc 3.3 specific workarounds to Boost.Python - under Redhat 8.0 the optimizer is broken for several of our modules - under Mac OS 10 I had a very hard time working around internal compiler errors and the optimizer is broken for virtually everything On the other hand, gcc 3.2 under Redhat 8.0 works like charm. I cannot remember any significant issues. But again, I don't know how this is related to gcc under cygwin. Ralf __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
