"Stefan Seefeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi Bohdan,
>
> even though you may think of a dom tree as 'just another tree', there is
> really quite a bit of domain-specific semantics associated with it
> that makes it impractical to use a general-purpose tree/graph library
> as the underlying representation.
<snip>

I didn't mean that dom::document==tree_container or even uses it, but
dom::document has tree_container-like interface plus some
additional domain-specific possibilities.


regards,
bohdan







_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to