> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 17:36 America/Denver, Schoenborn, Oliver > wrote: > >> > >> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 14:38 America/Denver, Boost wrote: > >> > >>> Why is there no strict-ownership smart-pointer in boost? > >>> Just curious to know what the reasons are. Thanks, > >> > >> What do want beyond what boost::scoped_ptr and > >> std::auto_ptr provide? > > > > Ability to be used in STL containers, and explicit transfer of > > ownership capabilities (e.g. *no* move-on-copy etc). > > So what would the copy semantics be?
No copy allowed, except temporarily when inside the container to insert or re-order or transfer from one container to another. Oliver _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
