David Abrahams wrote: [...] > > As for "Must not require that the source code be available for > > execution or other binary uses of the library"... well, what's the > > problem? www.boost.org was pretty stable, thus far. > > The problem is that we don't want to force companies to assume the > risk that www.boost.org will stick around.
Companies will keep the code anyway. The requirement is: "A Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form under its own license agreement, provided that: .... iv) states that source code for the Program is available from such Contributor, and informs licensees how to obtain it in a reasonable manner on or through a medium customarily used for software exchange." regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
