"Thomas Witt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wednesday 09 July 2003 19:43, David Abrahams wrote: > > I doubt that the _c version are needed frequently enough to warrant the extra > types. > Plus it will induce many libraries to use these versions which will make them unsuable on weaker compilers, such as BCC. I've seen many recent libraries using constructs like: mpl::if_c<is_xyz<T>::value,A,B> making those libraries unnecesarily broken for BCC. I much prefer to elude non-type versions of all metaprogramming stuff as much as possible, at least for the meantime, since brand new compilers still lack proper support for it.
Fernando Cacciola _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
