Daniel Spangenberg said: > Hello William! > > "William E. Kempf" schrieb: > >> You're correct, and the solution is simply to replace the < operator >> with std::less calls. > > You mean the std::less specialization on boost::mutex? (I wasn't aware, > that you provide total ordering on mutexes). Otherwise I don't see the > difference, I have to confess...
20.3.3/8 "For templates greater, less, greater_equal, and less_equal, the specializations for any pointer type yield a total order, even if the builtin operators <, >, <=, >= do not." -- William E. Kempf _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
