David Abrahams wrote: > That's really odd. > > Everything works perfectly on my machine with gcc-3.2 and CWPro8.3 > except for a numeric_traits_test failure with gcc-3.2 and that has no > relation to iterator_adaptors.
I can't believe it. Very strange. I've just removed libs/utility and re-"cvs update"d it. I'm reading (for example) libs/utility/transform_iterator_example.cpp which contains: typedef boost::transform_iterator_generator<Function, int*>::type doubling_iterator; And this is gone for good, I thought. So this should fail the compile. If it doesn't, for you, then either the XML post-processing is doing something wrong, or the dependency checking of bjam isn't doing its job. May I suggest that you remove (for example) (ALL_LOCATE_TARGET)/status/bin/transform_iterator_example.test and try re-running the regression tests? If this shows a different result, you may want to clean ALL_LOCATE_TARGET completely. :-) Jens Maurer _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
