With the addition of the variant library has come several closely-related components such as boost::get<T>, boost::apply_visitor, boost::static_visitor, and boost::visitor_ptr. While I do plan to submit a more general-purpose visitation library for review in the near feature, currently these components are essentially useless outside of their use with boost::variant.
Other components, however, are more general purpose -- namely, boost::empty and boost::incomplete. Since boost::empty is almost trivial, I plan to document and test it as part of the utility library. But boost::incomplete is generally quite useful (for example, in implementing the "pimpl" idiom), and I think Boosters may employ it often without boost::variant. My question then: should boost::incomplete be given its own libs/incomplete directory and an announcement on the main html page? Any input welcome. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
