On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:08:24 +0200, Pavel Vozenilek wrote: > "Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... >> There is currently no BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION since the idealistic >> goal has been to cover all widely used compilers one day, > ... >> On the other hand, perhaps you have a use case that clearly >> demonstrates > the >> need for BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION? >> > SMART_ASSERT library implements BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION equivalent > (it would be ugly to print out the default text).
Log-output again. And look at that workaround they used: Runtime-checking the values. Isn't that ugly? (No offense intended to the SMART_ASSERT-folks :) Even if it's just a small use-case, I am not the only one who would benefit from BOOST_HAS_CURRENT_FUNCTION. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
