> > John Torjo schrieb: > > > Exactly! Don't do anything! But in order not to do anything, I need to know > > whether the compiler support a FUNCTION-like macro or not. > > > > Otherwise, I won't know (and assume it has), and print to the user something > > like: > > > > function= '(unknown)'. > > > > Which would you prefer? > > I although think, that some additional detection macro, a la > > BOOST_HAS_NO_CURRENT_FUNCTION_AVAILABLE > > would be useful and consistent to other deficiency flags already existing > in the Boost library. > > Just my personal 0.02 EURO > True. With my 0.02 EURO, we already got 4 cents ;-)
Best, John _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
