Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IIUC, the 'T' that the standard mentions is the 'myclass' in Daniel > Spangenberg's example.
You're right. > The operators provided by X<T> should be found in T's namespace Ah, as I understand it. They're namespace-scope friend functions in the namespace of X, but that fact doesn't mean much because of course you can't access them with X::.... > , so it works whether 'T' is a template-id or not You're right. It works because the base classes of T are "associated" in: struct myclass : X<myclass> {}; -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost