"Nigel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Wouldn't it be better to use smaller internal memory block initially and > > resize it only when demand goes up? > > That's a good point, but it certainly complicates both the interface > and the semantics of the container. Could this style of circular > buffer be an adaptor, or perhaps a policy adaptor? > IMO the resize/shrink cannot be added via adaptor (unless it is very complex one).
It may be possible to design circular_buffer<> as adaptor over [vector | deque | list | slist | shrinkable vector | ...]. /Pavel _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
