Beman Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > An experimental version of today's Win32 compiler status table is > available at http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32.html > > Please look at the random library tests as an example. You should be > able to click on the "fail" superscripts to see a note as to the > specific status of each failure. > > This detailed accounting is intended to let Boost users, developers, > release managers, and compiler vendors know more about test failures. > > Because of the human effort involved, it will only be possible to do > this detailed accounting for compilers which have a small number of > failures. I'm hoping that for the next Boost release we can set a > release criteria of accounting for 100% of all tests on at least a few > compilers. > > Comments?
1. What do humans have to do in order to produce this annotation? 2. I still strongly prefer the overall format that meta-comm has been publishing. Can we integrate with that? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost