brock wrote: [...]
>> - "boost_gui_test/dialog.cpp" is pretty cool... I like it for its >> simplicity but the syntax could be even more elegant. Try some >> operator << instead > of >> a macro defined number of parameters. Nobody likes this idea. > > Probably true, I think I was just looking for an excuse to try the > preprocessor library :) Or an array of rows defined a compile-time, a list or rows at run-time, etc. >> - Work on the macro defined WxWindows signal / slot mechanism; this >> is ugly. Maybe the suggestions I've sent to Mr. Slettebo could help. > > I'll have to look into that. Most of the signal/slot stuff I do (if > I get your intention correctly) relies on boost::function<>. Find a way not to rely on "official macros". Those are false hopes. Philippe _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
