At 10:04 AM 8/4/2003, David Abrahams wrote:

>Pascal Bleser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> aCC tells me that it's the same function... yuck...
>> Agreed, it's a sick compiler
>
>You've hit the nail on the head.
>
>> , but nevertheless...
>> I will try once more using STLport, but it's not about the STL IMHO.
>
>My advice?  Don't waste your time.  Use GCC or some non-sick compiler
>for your platform, or, sadly, give up on Boost until HP gets their
>act together.

Dave's 100% right, AFAIC.

HP appears to be unresponsive, I'm afraid. It has gotten to the point where it is costing them long-time customers, but aCC still can't compile modern C++ code very well. A shame.

--Beman

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to