"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I don't understand the problem with the original code
> (as of revision 1.19), and I don't understand why
> 1.30.0 fails.

RC_1_30_0 is working for me with gcc-3.2 on Win32.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to