"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't understand the problem with the original code > (as of revision 1.19), and I don't understand why > 1.30.0 fails.
RC_1_30_0 is working for me with gcc-3.2 on Win32. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost