[Dave Abrahams]
> If I don't hear of any new problems with the RC_1_30_0 branch I'm
> going to release 1.30.2 tomorrow (Wed) evening or Thursday morning.
There's one little problem... it doesn't compile cleanly under -Wshadow with
gcc. This is annoying because it forces the user to:
1. Hack the headers to eliminate the warning (ugh, even if it's trivial)
If the headers are unhackable (e.g. someone else is root), then:
2. Mentally ignore the warning (ugh)
3. Stop using the warning (ugh)
The offending part is line 24 of boost/date_time/date_duration.hpp. Which
is:
explicit date_duration(duration_rep days) : days_(days) {};
This causes problems because the very next line defines a function
identically named to that duration_rep argument:
duration_rep days() const
gcc complains:
warning: declaration of `days' shadows a member of `this'
The fix is trivial: change the occurrences of "days" in line 24 to "d".
days_ of course should not be modified.
There are presumably other -Wshadow problems elsewhere in Boost, but this is
the only one that has affected my code so far.
Stephan T. Lavavej
http://stl.caltech.edu
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
