--- "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A visual interface is so slow sometimes when you > have to resize a button > group of 120 buttons, reorder the tab sequence, use > new fonts, redefine > standard margins, etc. This is too much technical. > Those caracteristics > should have their own defaults and you should be > able to define new values > to subgroups or child containers (toolbars, iconic > view, etc.). > > A spacer could be used also to simulate an invisible > widget taking space. I > also agree that proportionnal dimension properties > of the layout manager > could be added, it would be really great to say: I > want to use 1/3 - 2/3 for > 2 widgets horizontally or 3/5 - 1/5 - 1/5 for my 3 > columns, etc.
I think the library should be scaleable in respect to the space management. We can implment a set of predefined space managemenet strategies/polices, all the great stuff that we can come up with. However the user should be able to customize them in any way she likes. For instance the row/col management strategy can be just one of the predefined set. In general, I think that it is just an issues of clear definitions of space management basics that can be utilized by various specilized algorithms. Eugene __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost