----- Original Message ----- From: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Boost mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 1:02 AM Subject: Re: ublas and gcc (was: Re: [boost] Re: Compiler status for GCC 3.3)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Walter) writes: > > [...] > > | > This whole thing (-fabi-version) is messy. It is what one gets by > | > taking users for beta testers ;-) > | > | That's not the whole story. When testing with GCC 3.3.1 prerelease I noticed > | that setting -fabi-version isn't necessary anymore. So I filed a bug report > | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11812, which immediately got > | closed ;-). The subsequent discussion at > | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11105 leads me to believe that > | GCC 3.3 was too conservative w.r.t. ABI compatibility. > | > | Due to this and the fact that there's been another bug in GCC 3.3 > | (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11198) which manifests when > | using ublas, I tend to advise against using GCC 3.3 for ublas. > > GCC-3.3 is GCC-3.3.0 in disguise and I tend to refrain myself from > using .0 releases outside of experimental works :-). > > More seriously, did you have a chance to test GCC-3.3.1? Yes, GCC 3.3.1 works OK for me. Thanks, Joerg _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
