"David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [...] > BTW, normally, you might: > > struct Policy > { > template <class P> > struct apply > { > typename some_other_class type; > }; > }; > [...]
Ok, now I see what's going on. Create a metafunction class wrapper for the actual policy in the way you would create a functor for a normal function. It also makes sense why you might have called it a metafunctor. It's all starting to make sense. ;) This is also much less intrusive than what I was doing. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
