>> A namespace alias of fs:: is used in an example on one of the doc >> pages, and in some of the test and implementation code. Is that a >> concern? > >Yes! People will be very confused, IMO. I clearly was.
Hum... It really makes the tutorial hard to read if all the fs::'s are replaced with boost::filesystem::. How would you feel about the tutorial giving a
using boost::filesystem;
and then eliminating the qualification entirely? I was trying to avoid that, as it isn't the best programming practice, but people are used to simplification in tutorials so maybe it is OK.
I had thought the use of a namespace alias was the better solution.
>Ah, I haven't compiled anything yet. ;->
Oh:-! Well, that would clear up any confusion pretty quickly.
--Beman
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
