"Jeremy Siek" wrote: > Hi Bruce, 'Sup Jeremy, > Do you want to take a stab at making this change? Sure.
> Perhaps just DFS to begin with and then the other algorithms > afterwards. Alright. > instead of "dfs_traits<G>::buffer_value_type" how about > "dfs_buffer_traits<G>::value_type"? Sounds good. > To preserve backwards compatibility, instead of changing the non-named > parameter overload, I suggest adding another overload (with a longer list > of parameters). Okay. > Cheers, Skol! Bruce _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
