David Abrahams wrote:
I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
branch, though recent test updates at
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
reproduced those problems and addressed them on my machine, and the
results *are* checked in to CVS. Unless the RC_1_30_0 tag has somehow
magically been made non-sticky, or there's something wrong with the
testers' CVS update procedure, I don't see how it's possible.
Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating
to RC_1_30_0 and post new results?
Done. Unfortunately there are new regressions for
optional_test on gcc-2.95.3/Linux.
Regards,
m
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
