--- Andreas Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > BTW: Having separate heaps is one of the reasons why I could not > > use boost::shared_ptr. I ended up writing my own. :( > > Yeah, I ended up using intrusive_ptr. Not always an option either ...
In fact it is not clear how to marry STL and boost::shared_ptr<>. I love boost::shared_ptr but because of the lack of the allocator<> concept, STL and boost just don't live together (including other boost libraries). I guess my question is that, is boost redefining the memory management concepts that have been established by STL? I am a bit suprised by small number of comments from boost developers on this issue. IMO, if boost is to become a C++ standard, we'd have to resolve this conflict. In the mean-time, what are the boost recomendations on how to use STL and boost together? I am really confused, am I missing something here? Eugene __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
