"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I guess there is no equivalent to memcpy_moveable: but it looks rather
>> dangerous, what state is the original object left in afterwards etc?
>
> None. There is no original object after the move, only raw storage.

...which is a different meaning from move in our move proposal

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to