Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:23 pm, David Abrahams wrote: >> The other possible option would have been to simply not give the user >> a readable error message. I'm open to opinions that I chose the >> wrong balance. > > So we're breaking code in order to produce a better error message?
I suppose that's correct, though I didn't realize it when I was coding it. I guess I'd have to opt against the code breakage. > This seems like the wrong trade-off to make, especially because it > means it breaks code when users upgrade from VC6 to VC7; but we want > them to upgrade! Not to vc7 really; it's more broken than vc6 in some ways ;-) -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
