Gregory Colvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, Sep 1, 2003, at 11:31 America/Denver, Joel de Guzman wrote: > >> Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> vector<>::begin returns an object with operators * and ->, >>> yet these objects are not pointers, and once that is learned, >>> people do not think they are pointers. >> >> Huh? pointer semantics (behavior) does not mean that they >> have to be pointers. > > But would the following hold if p and q are optionl<int>? > > *q = 1; > p = q; > *p = 2; > assert(*q == 2);
No, because the model is half-baked, which is exactly the reason for my dislike. -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
