Douglas Gregor wrote: > Between the two: adaptable_any is better, I think. > > Because I like throwing wrenches: have you considered a very different > name such as "polymorphic" or just "poly". The idea is that we read: > > poly<less_than_comparable, equality_comparable> > > as "a type that is polymorphic over all less_than_comparable & > equality_comparable types." > > And because I'm feeling silly and reading a book on lattice theory... it > could also be named models_meet, as in "a type that models the meet of the > following concepts in the concept lattice". > > Doug
Both suggestions are too extreme, IMHO. -- Alexander Nasonov Remove minus and all between minus and at from my e-mail for timely response _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
