--- David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > I think construct/destroy can be implemented as non-customizable > > static functions in boost just for convinence. > > I think the word "static" is not what you meant, and is what led me > to challenge the suggestion.
I used word 'static' because I assumed that construct/destroy functions would be implemented in some 'memory' data type (just to qualify it). struct memory { static template< typename A > typename A::pointer construct( A& a, size_t n ) {...} static template< typename A > void destroy( typename A::pointer ) {...} }; Eugene __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost