"Pavel Vozenilek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ... >> Is there some reason you're defining your own iterators instead of >> using iterator_facade or iterator_adaptor? >> > iterator_adaptor is used here, AFAICS.
Normally you don't define your own operator[], which is why I assumed it was not. It might make sense if you really want operator[] to return a reference, I guess. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
